Blaise Bicknell vs Pranav Kumar Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 18 Jun at 07:29 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
B. Bicknell vs P. Kumar

JAM
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Bicknell 1 - 0 Kumar
They have played 2 sets in total, with Blaise Bicknell winning 2 and Pranav Kumar winning 0. The last match between Blaise Bicknell and Pranav Kumar was at the M25 Tulsa, 18-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Blaise Bicknell getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Bicknell | 1 |
Kumar | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Tulsa(06-18-25)
B. Bicknell vs P. Kumar H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
56.59% (116-89) | Career Total W/L | 45.00% (45-55) |
1 | Hard | 0 |
3 | Titles | 0 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
B. Bicknell vs P. Kumar Match Preview:
- How well do Bicknell and Kumar perform on their second serve? Bicknell wins 40.12% of points, while Kumar edges out with 44.65% in recent form.
- In returning their opponents’ second serves, Bicknell outperforms Kumar, winning 48.99% compared to Kumar's 43.16%.
- When facing an opponent's first serve, Bicknell has a significant advantage at 35.02%, while Kumar falls behind with 26.36%.
- Under pressure, Kumar has saved 54.02% of breakpoints, slightly better than Bicknell's 49.64%.
- Looking at their overall win records over the past year, Kumar has a better success rate with 51.52% compared to Bicknell's 40%.
- What about surface preferences? Bicknell excels on hard courts with a win rate of 60%, whereas Kumar's best is 53% on clay.
- Bicknell predominantly competes at the Challengers/ITF > $10K level with a 36.36% win rate, while Kumar primarily plays Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, winning 53.85% of the time.
- Both players face similar levels of opponents, with Bicknell's average opponent ranked at 323.15 and Kumar's at 317.7.
- If the match proceeds to a deciding set, Kumar's winning percentage is stronger at 44% compared to Bicknell's 29% over the past year.
- Analyzing breakpoint conversion rates, Bicknell is more effective, converting 42.27% of opportunities, while Kumar converts just 31.71%.
Editorial Prediction (June 18, 2025, UTC):
In their upcoming match, both Bicknell and Kumar enter with unique advantages based on recent form and historical stats. Second serve performance slightly favors Kumar, but Bicknell leads significantly in returning serve capabilities, especially on the first serve.
In terms of pressure handling, Kumar shows a better breakpoint save percentage. However, Bicknell counters with a superior breakpoint conversion rate, which can be a decisive factor as the match unfolds.
Both players have faced similarly ranked opponents in recent times, suggesting a well-matched contest. Kumar's edge in deciding sets could prove pivotal if the encounter remains tight.
Factoring in these elements, Bicknell's superior initial serve returns and effective breakpoint conversions give him a slight edge, suggesting he might be more likely to prevail in this clash.
Blaise Bicknell vs Pranav Kumar Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
B. Bicknell vs P. Kumar H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 4 |
2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
1:22:54 | Average Match Time | 1:22:54 |
52% (24/46) | 1st Serve % | 59% (42/71) |
75% (18/24) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (24/42) |
59% (13/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (10/29) |
26% (5/19) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
52% (37/71) | Return Points Win % | 33% (15/46) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
B. Bicknell Recent Matches Played
P. Kumar Recent Matches Played

B. Bicknell vs P. Kumar Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
56.59% (116/89) | YTD Win/Loss | 45.00% (45/55) |
55.84% (263/208) | Sets Win/Loss | 48.23% (109/117) |
51.88% (2316/2148) | Games Win/Loss | 49.46% (1097/1121) |
61.11% (77/49) | Hard Win/Loss | 45.59% (31/37) |
52.05% (38/35) | Clay Win/Loss | 52.63% (10/9) |
16.67% (1/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (4/8) |
0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
531 | Aces Total | 158 |
0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
633 | Total Double Faults | 220 |
1:25:35 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
426.13 | Average Opponent Rank | 259.84 |
65% (7949/12286) | 1st Serve % | 61% (2137/3523) |
67% (5363/7949) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (1380/2137) |
50% (2174/4336) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (644/1386) |
43% (491/1131) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (112/296) |
39% (4704/12003) | Return Points Win % | 37% (1266/3437) |
0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
40.00% (2/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
47.37% (36/40) | Challenger W/L | 29.41% (5/12) |
63.41% (78/45) | Futures W/L | 48.19% (40/43) |
57% (112/197) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 45% (45/100) |
0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
50% (32/64) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (11/21) |
49% (33/67) | Deciding Set Win % | 27% (7/26) |
82% (119/97) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 78% (51/40) |
18% (119/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 22% (51/11) |
22% (86/19) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (49/5) |